Summary
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ordered Woods MFI, LLC to file a motion explaining its late notice of appeal. The court noted that the notice was filed within 15 days after the deadline, permitting an implied extension request, but warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal.
Holdings
- When a perfecting instrument is filed within fifteen days after its due date, a motion for extension of time is necessarily implied, but the appellant remains obligated to provide a reasonable explanation for the late filing.
Questions Presented
- Whether the late notice of appeal, filed within fifteen days after the due date, permits an implied motion for extension under Texas appellate procedure.
- Whether the appellant must provide a reasonable explanation supporting the late filing and must be ordered to file a proper motion for extension.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997)(followed)
- Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…