In re L. Charles Moncla, Jr., J. Clarke Legler, II, William Restrepo, Daniel T. Layton, Layton Corporation, Platinum Energy Holdings, Inc., and Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc.

Summary

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals of Texas continued its abatement of an original mandamus proceeding because the parties were still working toward a settlement. The court directed the parties to report on the settlement status after thirty days and stated that the proceeding could be reinstated upon a dispositive motion or the court’s own motion.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the mandamus proceeding should remain abated while the parties continued settlement negotiations.

Disposition

other