Summary
The Texas Fourth Court of Appeals reversed a summary judgment in favor of Association Casualty Insurance Company in a dispute over alleged underpayment of a hotel water-damage insurance claim. The court held that a genuine issue of material fact existed regarding whether foreclosure left Peacock Hospitality with a breach-of-contract claim under the insurance policy. It also held that the insurer was not entitled to enforce a deed-of-trust covenant that purported to divest Peacock of its insurance-policy rights, and remanded the case for further proceedings.
Holdings
- A mortgagor may retain the right to recover insurance proceeds or sue for an alleged underpayment of a pre-foreclosure loss when the foreclosure leaves a surplus, or leaves a deficiency smaller than the insurance proceeds and alleged underpayment. Because the evidence did not establish whether the foreclosure resulted in a deficiency or surplus, a genuine issue of material fact existed.
- Association Casualty was not entitled to enforce the deed-of-trust covenant purporting to divest Peacock of rights in the insurance policy because the insurance company was not an intended third-party beneficiary of that covenant.
- The summary judgment must be reversed because the trial court's ruling on the prompt-payment and tort claims was based on the conclusion that Peacock had been divested of its breach-of-contract claim, and that underlying conclusion was erroneous.
Questions Presented
- Whether Peacock retained a right to sue Association Casualty for underpayment of a pre-foreclosure insurance claim after foreclosure of the mortgaged property.
- Whether Association Casualty could enforce a covenant in the deed of trust that purported to transfer the insured's rights in the insurance policy to the foreclosure purchaser.
- Whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment on Peacock's breach-of-contract, prompt-payment, and tort claims.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (10)
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Knott, 128 S.W.3d 211, 215 (Tex. 2003)(followed)
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co., 690 S.W.2d 546, 548-49 (Tex. 1985)(followed)
- Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. Gerdes, 880 S.W.2d 215, 217-18 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1994, writ denied)(distinguished)
- Texas Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 846 S.W.2d 580, 581-83 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1993, writ denied)(distinguished)
- Cloughly v. NBC Bank-Seguin, N.A., 773 S.W.2d 652, 654-55 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1989, writ denied)(distinguished)
- Smith v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co., 82 S.W.3d 580, 582, 584-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2002, pet. denied)(followed)
- Helmer v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co., 632 S.W.2d 194, 196 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1982, no writ)(followed)
- Campagna v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London, 549 S.W.2d 17, 18-19 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1977, writ ref'd n.r.e.)(followed)
- CWCapital Asset Management LLC v. Wausau Business Insurance Co., No. 04-08-00457-CV, 2009 WL 1900413, at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 1, 2009, no pet.)(followed)
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Electric Co., 995 S.W.2d 647, 651 (Tex. 1999)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.