Summary
The Fourth Court of Appeals of Texas considered an appeal from a forcible detainer judgment awarding possession of residential property to Sheila and Richard Olbrei. Because Victoria Coman had been removed from the property, had not posted a supersedeas bond, and did not establish a potentially meritorious right to current possession, the court held that the appeal was moot. The court vacated the trial court’s judgment.
Holdings
- An appeal from a forcible detainer judgment is moot when the appellant is no longer in possession, has not superseded the judgment, and fails to show a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession, even if the appellant timely and clearly expressed an intent to appeal.
- When an appeal becomes moot and appellate review on the merits is precluded, the appellate court must vacate the underlying trial court judgment.
Questions Presented
- Whether Coman’s appeal from the forcible detainer judgment remained a live controversy after she was removed from the property and failed to supersede the judgment.
- Whether the trial court’s judgment should be vacated because the appeal became moot.
Disposition
vacated
Cases Cited (2)
- Marshall v. Hous. Auth. of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 787–88 (Tex. 2006)(followed)
- Devilbiss v. Burch, No. 04-16-00711-CV, 2018 WL 2418476, at *2 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 30, 2018, no pet. h.) (mem. op.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…