David Rodriguez v. H-E-B, Jointly and Severally William Tate, Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H-E-B L.P., Stephen Martinez Jointly and Severally and as Employee of H-E-B L.P., Meredith Reid as Employee of H-E-B L.P., Jointly and Severally, Debra Ann Godoy as Employee of H-E-B L.P., et al.

Rodriguez v. H-E-B · Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio · April 16, 2020 · No. 04-19-00642-CV & 04-19-00795-CV

Summary

The Fourth Court of Appeals of Texas addressed an appellant’s constitutional recusal inquiry in two consolidated appeals. The court stated that any motion seeking disqualification of a justice must comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 16.3 and noted that certain justices were not related to the referenced trial judges.

Holdings

  1. If appellant seeks to disqualify a justice of the court, appellant must file a motion complying with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 16.3.

Questions Presented

  1. What procedural requirements apply if appellant seeks to disqualify a justice of the court in connection with the constitutional recusal inquiry?

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (2)

  • F.S. New Products, Inc. v. Strong Indus., Inc., 129 S.W.3d 594, 597 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.)(followed)
  • McCullough v. Kitzman, 50 S.W.3d 87, 88 (Tex. App.—Waco 2001, pet. denied)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…