Summary
The Ninth District Court of Appeals of Texas affirmed an order terminating J.D.J.'s parental rights to J.Y.J. and J.C.J. In an Anders appeal, the court independently reviewed the record, found no arguable error, and concluded that any appeal would be frivolous.
Holdings
- After independently reviewing the appellate record and counsel's Anders brief, the court found no arguable error requiring appointment of new counsel to rebrief the appeal.
- The trial court's order terminating J.D.J.'s parental rights was affirmed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Anders brief and independent review of the record revealed any arguable error requiring appointment of new appellate counsel and rebriefing.
- Whether the trial court's order terminating J.D.J.'s parental rights should be affirmed.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (3)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)(applied)
- In the Interest of L.D.T., 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2005, no pet.)(applied)
- Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(analogized)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…