Summary
The Texas Court of Appeals, Second District, dismissed David Glen Harris’s appeal from an order denying his motions for appointment of counsel in a probate proceeding. The court held that the order was not a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order and therefore dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Holdings
- An order denying motions for appointment of counsel in this probate proceeding was neither a final judgment nor an appealable interlocutory order, so the court of appeals lacked jurisdiction and was required to dismiss the appeal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the probate court's order denying motions for appointment of counsel was a final judgment or an appealable interlocutory order.
- Whether the court of appeals had subject-matter jurisdiction over the appeal.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001)(followed)
- Crowson v. Wakeham, 897 S.W.2d 779, 783 (Tex. 1995)(followed)
- Okumu v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 02-09-00384-CV, 2010 WL 87735, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 7, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…