Larry Torres v. The State of Texas

Nos. 14-15-00155-CR, 14-15-00156-CR, 14-15-00157-CR, 14-15-00158-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Dec. 15, 2015) · Fourteenth Court of Appeals of Texas · December 15, 2015 · No. Nos. 14-15-00155-CR, 14-15-00156-CR, 14-15-00157-CR

Summary

The Texas Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s denial of Larry Torres’s motion to suppress evidence and testimony. The court held that Torres voluntarily consented to the vehicle search and that officers had reasonable suspicion to detain him based on the totality of the circumstances.

Holdings

  1. The State proved by clear and convincing evidence that Torres voluntarily consented to the search of his vehicle. The consent was not rendered involuntary by his exhaustion, the absence of written consent, or the circumstances of the encounter.
  2. Torres's consent to search the vehicle extended to the lockbox in the trunk because the lockbox could contain illegal items and Torres had provided the key used to open it.
  3. The officers had reasonable suspicion to detain Torres and conduct a protective frisk; probable cause was not required for the investigative detention.
  4. The trial court's statement that Torres could have been arrested for public intoxication did not require reversal because the suppression ruling was correct on other applicable legal theories.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying suppression of testimony and evidence allegedly obtained as the fruit of an illegal detention.
  2. Whether the officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigative detention and protective frisk after asking Torres to exit his vehicle.
  3. Whether the State proved by clear and convincing evidence that Torres voluntarily consented to the search of his vehicle.
  4. Whether the trial court erred in finding that Torres could have been arrested for public intoxication.
  5. Whether the evidence obtained from the vehicle and lockbox was suppressible because the search exceeded the scope of Torres's consent.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (24)

  • Martinez v. State, 348 S.W.3d 919, 922-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011)(followed)
  • Gutierrez v. State, 221 S.W.3d 680, 687 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007)(followed)
  • State v. Ross, 32 S.W.3d 853, 855-56 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000)(followed)
  • Carmouche v. State, 10 S.W.3d 323, 331 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000)(followed)
  • Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 228 (1973)(followed)
  • Meekins v. State, 340 S.W.3d 454, 459 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011)(followed)
  • Whitmire v. State, 183 S.W.3d 522, 528 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, pet. ref'd)(followed)
  • United States v. Sledge, 546 F.2d 1120, 1121-22 (4th Cir. 1977)(followed by analogy)
  • King v. State, 585 S.W.2d 720, 722 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1979)(followed by analogy)
  • Higgins v. State, 924 S.W.2d 739, 743-45 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1996, pet. ref'd)(followed by analogy)

Showing top 10 of 24.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…