Summary
The Fourteenth Court of Appeals of Texas affirmed a conviction for aggravated robbery after reviewing counsel’s Anders brief and finding no reversible error. The court reformed the judgment to delete $7,604.48 in court-appointed attorneys’ fees because the record did not show a material change in the indigent appellant’s financial circumstances.
Holdings
- The assessment of $7,604.48 in attorney's fees was improper because the record contained no factual determination that Williams's financial circumstances had materially changed or that he had resources to repay the costs of appointed counsel.
- When an Anders appeal presents no arguable grounds and the judgment can be corrected by reformation, the appellate court need not abate the appeal for appointment of new counsel.
- The appeal was wholly frivolous and without merit, and the record disclosed no reversible error.
Questions Presented
- Whether the record supported the assessment of attorney's fees against an appellant who had been found indigent and appointed counsel.
- Whether the court of appeals should affirm the conviction after reviewing an Anders brief finding no arguable grounds for appeal.
- Whether the judgment could be reformed in the Anders appeal without abating the appeal for appointment of new counsel.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (8)
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)(followed)
- High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978)(followed)
- Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)(followed)
- Cates v. State, 402 S.W.3d 250, 251–52 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013)(followed)
- Ferguson v. State, 435 S.W.3d 291, 295 (Tex. App.—Waco 2014, no pet.)(followed)
- Bray v. State, 179 S.W.3d 725, 730 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005, no pet.)(followed)
- Getts v. State, 155 S.W.3d 153, 155 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(followed)
- Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…