Alvin M. Burns, I.M. Burns, Dimmit County, Hakim Dermish, Robert L. Ramirez and Edward J. Dryden v. Rosetta Resources, Ltd., a/k/a Rosetta Resources, Inc., Eusebio Cantu Torres, Eusebio Torres, Jr., Gladiator Energy Services, LLC

No. 04-16-00593-CV · Fourth Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio · October 27, 2016 · No. No. 04-16-00593-CV

Summary

The Fourth Court of Appeals of San Antonio orders certain appellants to explain their untimely notices of appeal. The court states that the notices were filed within the fifteen-day grace period but without motions for extension, and warns that failure to provide a reasonable explanation may result in dismissal.

Holdings

  1. When an appellant acting in good faith files a notice of appeal after the Rule 26.1 deadline but within the fifteen-day period provided by Rule 26.3, the notice necessarily implies a motion for extension of time.
  2. An appellant relying on an implied motion for extension must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal timely.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether a notice of appeal filed within the fifteen-day grace period of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, but without a separately filed motion for extension, may be treated as accompanied by an implied motion for extension.
  2. Whether appellants relying on an implied motion for extension must provide a reasonable explanation for their failure to timely file the notice of appeal.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (1)

  • Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…