Summary
The Fourth Court of Appeals of San Antonio orders certain appellants to explain their untimely notices of appeal. The court states that the notices were filed within the fifteen-day grace period but without motions for extension, and warns that failure to provide a reasonable explanation may result in dismissal.
Holdings
- When an appellant acting in good faith files a notice of appeal after the Rule 26.1 deadline but within the fifteen-day period provided by Rule 26.3, the notice necessarily implies a motion for extension of time.
- An appellant relying on an implied motion for extension must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal timely.
Questions Presented
- Whether a notice of appeal filed within the fifteen-day grace period of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3, but without a separately filed motion for extension, may be treated as accompanied by an implied motion for extension.
- Whether appellants relying on an implied motion for extension must provide a reasonable explanation for their failure to timely file the notice of appeal.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…