Summary
The Fourth Court of Appeals of San Antonio dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction because the trial court's order was interlocutory and not a final, appealable order. The court noted that the appellant did not respond to its order to show cause concerning dismissal.
Holdings
- The court of appeals lacked jurisdiction because the trial court's order was interlocutory rather than final and appealable.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court of appeals had jurisdiction over an appeal from the interlocutory order.
- Whether the interlocutory order was a final, appealable order under Texas law.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- In re D.M.B., 467 S.W.3d 100, 102 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2015, pet. denied)(followed)
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001)(followed)
- In re C.M., No. 01-15-00830-CV, 2016 WL 1054589, at *5 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 17, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…