Summary
The Supreme Court of Texas held that Brookshire Grocery owed no duty to warn an employee about the commonly known risk of maneuvering around a loaded cart. The court reversed the court of appeals and rendered judgment that the employee take nothing.
Holdings
- Brookshire owed Goss no duty to warn her of, or provide specialized training concerning, the risk of stepping around a loaded lowboy cart because that danger was commonly known and appreciated by Goss.
- The absence of a duty to warn is a threshold element of liability, not an affirmative assumption-of-risk defense.
Questions Presented
- Whether Brookshire owed Goss a duty to warn or provide specialized training concerning the danger of maneuvering around a loaded lowboy cart in a confined cooler.
- Whether the court of appeals improperly characterized Brookshire's duty argument as an unavailable assumption-of-risk defense.
Disposition
reversed
Cases Cited (5)
- Kroger Co. v. Elwood, 197 S.W.3d 793 (Tex. 2006)(followed)
- Jack in the Box, Inc. v. Skiles, 221 S.W.3d 566 (Tex. 2007)(followed)
- Gen. Elec. Co. v. Moritz, 257 S.W.3d 211 (Tex. 2008)(followed)
- In re Brookshire Grocery Co., 250 S.W.3d 66 (Tex. 2008)(followed)
- 208 S.W.3d 706, 715-23(disapproved in part)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…