In re Carolina Garza

544 S.W.3d 836 (Tex. 2018) · Supreme Court of Texas · April 13, 2018 · No. No. 17-0395

Summary

The Supreme Court of Texas conditionally granted mandamus relief to Carolina Garza from discovery sanctions imposed by a Jim Wells County district court. The court held that the sanctions were arbitrary because there was no evidence that Garza was responsible for nonparties’ failure to produce records or for their seeking protective orders in Bexar County. It also held that excluding the treating surgeon’s testimony, medical records, billing records, and related hospital evidence substantially compromised Garza’s claims and left her without an adequate remedy by appeal.

Holdings

  1. The trial court abused its discretion by imposing sanctions on Garza without evidence that she caused or participated in the alleged discovery violations and by sanctioning her for the independent, lawful actions of nonparty custodians seeking protective orders.
  2. Appeal was inadequate because excluding Leonard's testimony, provider employees and agents, medical and billing records, and substantial medical expenses would severely compromise Garza's ability to present her personal-injury and damages claims.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Jim Wells County trial court abused its discretion by imposing discovery sanctions on Garza for the lawful conduct of nonparty medical-record custodians without evidence that Garza was an offender.
  2. Whether Garza had an adequate remedy by appeal from the interlocutory sanctions order excluding critical expert testimony, witnesses, medical records, and medical expenses.

Disposition

writ_granted

Cases Cited (10)

  • TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913, 917, 919-920 (Tex. 1991)(followed)
  • In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-138 (Tex. 2004)(followed)
  • In re Ford Motor Co., 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2005)(followed)
  • Loftin v. Martin, 776 S.W.2d 145, 146 (Tex. 1989)(followed)
  • Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 843 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding)(followed)
  • Braden v. Downey, 811 S.W.2d 922, 928-929 (Tex. 1991)(followed)
  • In re Brookshire Grocery Co., 250 S.W.3d 66, 69 (Tex. 2008)(followed)
  • Bayou Pipeline Corp. v. R.R. Comm'n of Tex., 568 S.W.2d 122, 125 (Tex. 1978)(followed)
  • Revco, D.S., Inc. v. Cooper, 873 S.W.2d 391, 396-397 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, no writ)(applied by analogy)
  • Garza v. Logistics, No. 04-17-00096-CV, 2017 WL 1161169, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Mar. 29, 2017)(procedural history only)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…