Summary
The Texas Supreme Court denied review and mandamus, holding that a trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering targeted jurisdictional discovery before ruling on a sovereign-immunity-based plea to the jurisdiction. The case involves an ultra vires claim under Texas Government Code § 614 (law enforcement officer complaint procedures), where factual disputes about whether disciplinary action was taken before providing a signed complaint are jurisdictional, not merely merits-based. While courts must resolve jurisdiction before reaching the merits, they may authorize discovery necessary to determine jurisdictional facts, even if it overlaps with merits issues.
Holdings
- The trial court did not improperly order merits discovery; the discovery ordered was permissible jurisdictional discovery necessary to resolve factual issues related to the plea to the jurisdiction.
Questions Presented
- Whether the trial court improperly ordered merits discovery before ruling on TSU's sovereign-immunity-based plea to the jurisdiction.
Disposition
writ_denied
Cases Cited (15)
- City of Houston v. Rhule, 417 S.W.3d 440, 442 (Tex. 2013)(quoted for proposition)
- Bland Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Blue, 34 S.W.3d 547, 553–54 (Tex. 2000)(quoted in Rhule)
- Reata Constr. Corp. v. City of Dallas, 197 S.W.3d 371, 379 (Tex. 2006) (Brister, J., concurring)(quoted for proposition)
- In re Lazy W Dist. No. 1, 493 S.W.3d 538, 544 (Tex. 2016)(quoted for proposition)
- Tex. Dep't of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. 2004)(quoted for proposition)
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env't, 523 U.S. 83, 94 (1998)(quoted for proposition)
- Great S. Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. Jones, 177 U.S. 449, 453 (1900)(quoted in Steel Co.)
- Shamrock Psychiatric Clinic, P.A. v. DHHS, 540 S.W.3d 553, 559 (Tex. 2018)(quoted for proposition)
- Harrell v. State, 286 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2009)(quoted for proposition)
- Hous. Mun. Employees Pension Sys. v. Ferrell, 248 S.W.3d 151, 158 (Tex. 2007)(quoted in Harrell)
Showing top 10 of 15.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.