Matter of Ricardo Mercado-Martinez

29 I&N Dec. 529 (BIA 2026) · Board of Immigration Appeals · March 26, 2026 · No. Interim Decision #4176

Summary

The Board of Immigration Appeals held that a Form I-213 is presumptively admissible and reliable, and that an Immigration Judge finding it unreliable and insufficient to establish alienage must identify specific record evidence rebutting that presumption. The Board sustained DHS's appeal, vacated the Immigration Judge's order terminating removal proceedings, and remanded for clearer factual findings and further proceedings concerning the respondent's alienage and method of entry.

Holdings

  1. DHS satisfied its burden of proving that the respondent was a native and citizen of Mexico through the respondent's written admissions and the independent evidence contained in the Form I-213.
  2. A Form I-213 is presumptively admissible and reliable, and when an Immigration Judge finds it unreliable and insufficient to establish alienage, the judge must identify specific evidence in the record sufficient to rebut that presumption.
  3. The Immigration Judge's decision lacked sufficient factual findings concerning the respondent's method of entry to permit meaningful appellate review.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether DHS established the respondent's alienage by clear and convincing evidence.
  2. Whether the Form I-213 was presumptively reliable and sufficient to establish alienage absent specific evidence rebutting its reliability.
  3. Whether the Immigration Judge made sufficiently clear factual findings concerning the respondent's method of entry to permit meaningful appellate review.
  4. Whether the proceedings should be terminated or remanded for the Immigration Judge to determine whether the respondent met his burden after DHS established alienage.

Disposition

reversed_and_remanded

Cases Cited (10)

  • Mondac-Vega v. Lynch, 808 F.3d 413, 420-22 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Rosa v. Bondi, 144 F.4th 37, 41 (1st Cir. 2025)(noted)
  • Vera Punin v. Garland, 108 F.4th 114, 125-26 (2d Cir. 2024)(followed)
  • Antia-Perea v. Holder, 768 F.3d 647, 657 (7th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Espinoza v. INS, 45 F.3d 308, 310-11 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Matter of Barcenas, 19 I&N Dec. 609, 611 (BIA 1988)(followed)
  • Hernandez-Guadarrama v. Ashcroft, 394 F.3d 674, 680 (9th Cir. 2005)(distinguished)
  • INS v. Lopez Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032, 1049 (1984)(noted)
  • Matter of S-H-, 23 I&N Dec. 462, 464-65 (BIA 2002)(followed)
  • Matter of A-P-, 22 I&N Dec. 468, 477 (BIA 1999)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from U S Department Of Justice Executive Office For Immigration Review Board Of Immigration Appeals Board