Bryan Mitchell v. H. Gomez, et al.

Mitchell v. Gomez · United States District Court for the Central District of California · November 7, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-05847-SVW-DTB

Summary

The court dismissed Bryan Mitchell’s civil action without prejudice because he neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a complete in forma pauperis request. The dismissal followed the plaintiff’s failure to comply with a prior order within the allotted 30-day period.

Holdings

  1. A civil action in federal district court requires payment of the filing fee unless the plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis; prisoners who receive in forma pauperis status remain responsible for the fee through installment payments.
  2. The court may dismiss an action without prejudice when a plaintiff fails to comply with an order requiring payment of the filing fee or submission of a complete in forma pauperis request.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or submit a complete in forma pauperis request after being ordered to do so.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (3)

  • Johnson v. High Desert State Prison, 127 F.4th 123, 126, 128 (9th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-31 (1962)(followed)
  • Allen v. United States Dist. Ct. Dist. of Nevada, 2022 WL 16702429, at *2 (D. Nev. Oct. 25, 2022)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…