Summary
The court granted Jose Perez Colixto’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his continued immigration detention without a bond hearing. It held that, because he was detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226 rather than the mandatory-detention provisions of § 1225(b)(2)(A), he was entitled to a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge. The court ordered that the hearing occur within fourteen days and required Respondents to file a status report within three days after the hearing.
Holdings
- Because Petitioner was not seeking initial admission and was an alien already in the country, his detention is governed by the discretionary detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), not the mandatory-detention provision of § 1225(b)(2)(A).
- Petitioner is entitled to a bond hearing before an Immigration Judge, and his continued detention without such a hearing is unlawful and violates due process.
Questions Presented
- Whether Petitioner, a noncitizen who entered the United States without inspection but is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226, is entitled to a bond hearing under § 1226(a) rather than mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A).
- Whether Petitioner's continued detention without a bond hearing violates due process.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (4)
- Duarte Escobar v. Perry, 807 F. Supp. 3d 564 (E.D. Va. 2025)(followed by analogy)
- Hasan v. Crawford, 800 F. Supp. 3d 641, 651-657 (E.D. Va. 2025)(followed)
- Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21, 32 (1982)(applied and distinguished)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 693 (2001)(applied)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…