Jerry Namba, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Mahmood Jafroodi and Michael Kaylor, in His Capacity as Trustee of the Jafroodi Private Retirement Trust Plan Dated April 6th, 2018; Jerry Namba, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Vahid Jafroodi and Azar Jafroodi

Jafroodi · United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Northern Division · November 30, 2025 · No. CV25-11420-JFW; Case No. 9:19-bk-11918-MB; Adv. No. 9:22-ap-01063-MB (consolidated with 9:22-ap-01064-MB)

Summary

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California considers whether Mahmood Jafroodi and Michael Kaylor preserved their Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial on the trustee’s fraudulent-transfer and related avoidance claims. The court rejects the trustee’s arguments that the defendants waived the jury-trial right by failing to seek prompt withdrawal of the reference or that a prior district-court order denying withdrawal precludes a jury trial. The court concludes that the proceeding should be transferred to the district court for a jury trial on the avoidance actions and for further adjudication of the remaining claims.

Holdings

  1. A party that timely and properly demands a jury trial under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9015 does not waive the Seventh Amendment jury-trial right merely by failing to immediately seek withdrawal of the bankruptcy reference.
  2. The district court's prior denial of withdrawal did not extinguish defendants' timely asserted Seventh Amendment jury-trial rights.
  3. Because pretrial matters were complete and Jafroodi and Kaylor retained their jury-trial rights, the proceeding should be transferred to the district court for a jury trial on the fraudulent-transfer claims and for determination of how to adjudicate the remaining claims.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether defendants who timely demand a jury trial waive their Seventh Amendment rights by failing to promptly seek withdrawal of the reference to the bankruptcy court.
  2. Whether the district court's prior denial of a motion to withdraw the reference extinguished defendants' timely asserted jury-trial rights.
  3. Whether the bankruptcy court should transfer the proceeding to the district court for a jury trial on the fraudulent-transfer claims.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (18)

  • Stainer v. Latimer (In re Latimer), 918 F.2d 136 (10th Cir. 1990)(declined to follow)
  • Sigma Micro Corp. v. Healthcentral.com (In re Healthcentral.com), 504 F.3d 775 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33 (1989)(followed)
  • Katchen v. Landy, 382 U.S. 323 (1966)(followed)
  • In re Hallahan, 936 F.2d 1496 (7th Cir. 1991)(not decided)
  • In re Romar International Georgia, Inc., 198 B.R. 407 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1996)(not decided)
  • In re Lion Country Safari, Inc. California, 124 B.R. 566 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1991)(not decided)
  • SEC v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. 109 (2024)(followed)
  • Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474 (1935)(followed)
  • Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…