Summary
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California considers whether Mahmood Jafroodi and Michael Kaylor preserved their Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial on the trustee’s fraudulent-transfer and related avoidance claims. The court rejects the trustee’s arguments that the defendants waived the jury-trial right by failing to seek prompt withdrawal of the reference or that a prior district-court order denying withdrawal precludes a jury trial. The court concludes that the proceeding should be transferred to the district court for a jury trial on the avoidance actions and for further adjudication of the remaining claims.
Holdings
- A party that timely and properly demands a jury trial under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b) and Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9015 does not waive the Seventh Amendment jury-trial right merely by failing to immediately seek withdrawal of the bankruptcy reference.
- The district court's prior denial of withdrawal did not extinguish defendants' timely asserted Seventh Amendment jury-trial rights.
- Because pretrial matters were complete and Jafroodi and Kaylor retained their jury-trial rights, the proceeding should be transferred to the district court for a jury trial on the fraudulent-transfer claims and for determination of how to adjudicate the remaining claims.
Questions Presented
- Whether defendants who timely demand a jury trial waive their Seventh Amendment rights by failing to promptly seek withdrawal of the reference to the bankruptcy court.
- Whether the district court's prior denial of a motion to withdraw the reference extinguished defendants' timely asserted jury-trial rights.
- Whether the bankruptcy court should transfer the proceeding to the district court for a jury trial on the fraudulent-transfer claims.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (18)
- Stainer v. Latimer (In re Latimer), 918 F.2d 136 (10th Cir. 1990)(declined to follow)
- Sigma Micro Corp. v. Healthcentral.com (In re Healthcentral.com), 504 F.3d 775 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg, 492 U.S. 33 (1989)(followed)
- Katchen v. Landy, 382 U.S. 323 (1966)(followed)
- In re Hallahan, 936 F.2d 1496 (7th Cir. 1991)(not decided)
- In re Romar International Georgia, Inc., 198 B.R. 407 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1996)(not decided)
- In re Lion Country Safari, Inc. California, 124 B.R. 566 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1991)(not decided)
- SEC v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. 109 (2024)(followed)
- Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474 (1935)(followed)
- Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 18.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.