In re Hillcrest Ventures, LLC

Case No. 1:25-bk-11472-MB · United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California · March 18, 2026 · No. 1:25-bk-11472-MB

Summary

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California ruled on Royal Business Bank’s motion for relief from the automatic stay in Hillcrest Ventures, LLC’s Chapter 11 case. The court found that the bank lacked adequate protection, that the debtor had no equity in the collateral, and that the debtor failed to show a reasonable prospect of successful reorganization. The court granted relief under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) and (d)(2) but declined to waive the 14-day stay under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 4001(a)(3).

Holdings

  1. Cause existed to grant relief from the automatic stay because no equity cushion protected the bank's interest in the Main Property and the debtor was unable to make adequate protection payments.
  2. The debtor had no equity in the Main Property because the property's value was less than the aggregate amount of liens encumbering it.
  3. The debtor failed to prove that the Main Property was necessary to an effective reorganization because it failed to demonstrate a reasonable possibility of successful reorganization within a reasonable time.
  4. The court declined to waive the 14-day stay applicable to the order granting relief from the automatic stay.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether cause existed under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1) to grant relief from the automatic stay because the bank's interest was not adequately protected.
  2. Whether relief was required under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(2) because the debtor lacked equity in the Main Property and failed to show that the property was necessary to an effective reorganization within a reasonable time.
  3. Whether the court should waive the 14-day stay applicable to an order granting relief from the automatic stay under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 4001(a)(3).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (9)

  • O'Rourke v. Seaboard Sur. Co. (In re E.R. Fegert, Inc.), 887 F.2d 955, 957–58 (9th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Ent., Inc., 112 F. Supp. 3d 1011, 1033–34 (C.D. Cal. 2015)(followed)
  • Wellness Int'l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, 575 U.S. 665, 670–71 (2015)(followed)
  • United Sav. Ass'n of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Assocs., Ltd., 484 U.S. 365, 371, 375–76 (1988)(followed)
  • Pistole v. Mellor (In re Mellor), 734 F.2d 1396, 1400 & n.2 (9th Cir. 1984)(followed)
  • Pa. State Emp. Ret. Fund v. Roane (In re Roane), 8 B.R. 997 (Bankr. E.D. Pa.), aff'd, 14 B.R. 542 (E.D. Pa. 1981)(followed)
  • Stewart v. Gurley, 745 F.2d 1194, 1195 (9th Cir. 1984)(followed)
  • Sun Valley Newspapers, Inc. v. Sun World Corp. (In re Sun Valley Newspapers, Inc.), 171 B.R. 71, 75 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Sumitomo Tr. & Banking Co. v. Holly's, Inc. (In re Holly's, Inc.), 140 B.R. 643, 700–02 (Bankr. W.D. Mich. 1992)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from United States Bankruptcy Court For The Central District Of California San Fernando Valley Division U