In re Annielee Regan Click

In re Click · United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas, San Angelo Division · February 9, 2026 · No. 25-60059-bwo13

Summary

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas overruled Annielee Regan Click’s objection to Robbie and Heath Robinson’s Claim No. 6. The court held that Texas law governed the promissory note, that the note was not ambiguous regarding interest on matured unpaid amounts, and that an 18% post-acceleration interest rate was permitted. The court therefore allowed the creditors’ claim in full.

Holdings

  1. Texas law governs the interpretation and enforcement of the note because the lending transaction and related documents were centered in Texas.
  2. The note was not ambiguous merely because it did not specify a numerical rate for matured, unpaid amounts; its reference to the highest rate allowed by law identified a legally determinable rate.
  3. The applicable interest rate for matured, unpaid amounts under the note was 18%.
  4. The Debtor failed to rebut the prima facie validity and amount of Claim No. 6, and the Creditors proved their entitlement to the claimed amount, including 18% post-acceleration interest.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the note's provision charging the highest interest rate allowed by law for matured, unpaid amounts was ambiguous under Texas law.
  2. Which state's law governed interpretation and enforcement of the note.
  3. Whether Texas law permitted an 18% interest rate on the matured, unpaid amounts after acceleration.
  4. Whether the Debtor rebutted the prima facie validity and amount of the Creditors' proof of claim.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (10)

  • McGee v. O'Connor (In re O'Connor), 153 F.3d 258, 260 (5th Cir. 1998)(followed)
  • Bryant v. Bosco Credit Tr. II Tr. Series 2010-1, 621 B.R. 113, 116 (N.D. Tex. 2020)(followed)
  • In re Armstrong, 320 B.R. 97, 102-03 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. 2005)(followed)
  • Raleigh v. Ill. Dep't of Revenue, 530 U.S. 15, 20 (2000)(followed)
  • Hence v. Indian Cave Park P'ship, No. H-07-0098, 2007 WL 1176787, at *3-4 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2007)(followed)
  • Ali v. Merchant (In re Ali), No. 13-50724-CAG, 2015 WL 4611343, at *38-40 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. July 23, 2015)(followed)
  • ERI Consulting Eng'rs, Inc. v. Swinnea, 318 S.W.3d 867, 875 (Tex. 2010)(followed)
  • Hance, Scarborough, Wright, Ginsberg & Brusilow L.L.P. v. Kincaid, 70 S.W.3d 907, 911 n.4 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, pet. denied)(followed)
  • Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Tex. Sys. v. IDEXX Lab'ys, Inc., 691 S.W.3d 438, 443 (Tex. 2024)(followed)
  • All Seasons Window & Door Mfg., Inc. v. Red Dot Corp., 181 S.W.3d 490, 497-98 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from United States Bankruptcy Court For The Northern District Of Texas San Angelo Division United States