Summary
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit considers whether an IRS Appeals Officer conducting a collection due process hearing must verify compliance with the supervisory-approval requirement for penalties under 26 U.S.C. § 6751(b)(1). The court holds that this requirement is an applicable law or administrative procedure covered by the verification mandate in 26 U.S.C. § 6330(c)(1), even where the underlying liabilities and penalties were previously adjudicated. The court reverses the relevant Tax Court orders and remands for further proceedings.
Holdings
- When § 6751(b)(1) applies to penalties that are the subject of IRS collection efforts, § 6330(c)(1) requires the Appeals Officer conducting a collection due process hearing concerning a lien or proposed levy to verify that the required written supervisory approval was obtained.
- The Appeals Officer's failure to verify compliance with § 6751(b)(1) invalidated the Appeals Office's approval of the liens and proposed levies used to collect the penalties, but did not invalidate the underlying penalties or overall tax liabilities.
- The prior adjudication of the taxpayers' underlying liabilities did not preclude their challenge to the Appeals Officer's compliance with the independent verification obligation in § 6330(c)(1).
Questions Presented
- Whether 26 U.S.C. § 6330(c)(1) requires an Appeals Officer conducting a collection due process hearing concerning a tax lien or proposed levy to verify compliance with the written supervisory-approval requirement in 26 U.S.C. § 6751(b)(1), even when the underlying penalties and liabilities were previously adjudicated.
- Whether the Appeals Officer's failure to perform or establish that verification invalidated the approval of liens and proposed levies used to collect the penalties.
- Whether res judicata, claim-preclusion principles, or harmless-error considerations excused the failure to verify supervisory approval.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (19)
- United States v. Bisceglia, 420 U.S. 141, 145 (1975)(followed)
- Our Country Home Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner, 855 F.3d 773, 779-80 (7th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Iames v. Commissioner, 850 F.3d 160, 162, 165-67 (4th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Humboldt Shelby Holding Corp. & Subs. v. Commissioner, 606 F. App'x 20, 21 (2d Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Warner Enterprises, Inc. v. Commissioner, 124 T.C.M. (CCH) 98, 2022 WL 3584090, at *4-5 (T.C. 2022)(rejected)
- Williams v. Commissioner, 718 F.3d 89, 91-92 (2d Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 598 U.S. 69, 74 (2023)(followed)
- Republic of Iraq v. Beaty, 556 U.S. 848, 856 (2009)(followed)
- United States v. Gonzales, 520 U.S. 1, 5 (1997)(followed)
- Dinino v. Commissioner, 98 T.C.M. (CCH) 559, 2009 WL 4723652, at *7 (T.C. 2009)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 19.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.