Victor B. Skaar v. Douglas A. Collins

No. 25-4066 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · January 22, 2026 · No. No. 25-4066

Summary

The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims denied Victor B. Skaar's petition for extraordinary relief under the All Writs Act. The Court held that the Board of Veterans' Appeals had ruled on Skaar's request to aggregate claims, that ordinary appellate review provided an adequate alternative means of relief, and that he had not shown a clear and indisputable right to mandamus. The Court also concluded that VA had not unreasonably delayed adjudicating his claims.

Holdings

  1. Skaar was not entitled to an extraordinary writ because the requested relief was not necessary to protect the Court's prospective jurisdiction and an adequate alternative means of relief existed through a future appeal from a final adverse Board decision.
  2. Skaar failed to establish a clear and indisputable right to a writ directing the Board to decide the aggregation motion on a particular merits-based ground rather than on the Board's categorical authority-based ground.
  3. VA did not unreasonably delay ruling on the aggregation motion because it provided a clear answer that the Board lacked authority to aggregate claims or certify a class.
  4. Even assuming Skaar asserted unreasonable delay concerning his individual skin-cancer claim, the record did not show unreasonable delay because VA had been actively processing the claim.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Court should issue an All Writs Act writ directing the Board to recognize authority to aggregate claims or certify a proposed class of Palomares veterans.
  2. Whether an extraordinary writ was necessary to protect the Court's prospective jurisdiction when Skaar could challenge the Board's ruling in a future appeal from a final adverse Board decision.
  3. Whether VA unreasonably delayed ruling on Skaar's aggregation motion or adjudicating his individual skin-cancer claim.

Disposition

writ_denied

Cases Cited (20)

  • Skaar v. Wilkie, 32 Vet.App. 156 (2019) (en banc order)(followed for jurisdictional principles; prior history noted)
  • Skaar v. McDonough, 48 F.4th 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2022)(prior-case history)
  • Skaar v. Wilkie, 33 Vet.App. 127 (2020)(prior-case history)
  • Skaar v. Collins, 38 Vet.App. 225 (2025) (per curiam order)(followed)
  • Love v. McDonough, 35 Vet.App. 336, 342 (2022) (per curiam order)(followed)
  • Love v. McDonough, 100 F.4th 1388 (Fed. Cir. 2024)(prior history)
  • Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n, 319 U.S. 21, 26 (1943)(followed)
  • Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976)(followed)
  • Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380-81 (2004)(followed)
  • Martin v. O'Rourke, Martin v. O'Rourke, 891 F.3d 1338, 1343-45 (Fed. Cir. 2018)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 20.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…