Summary
The Central District of California ordered the parties to submit a joint status report addressing any remediation of alleged ADA barriers and their intended summary-judgment motions. The court also ordered the plaintiff to show cause why it should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state-law claims, identify the statutory damages sought, and provide declarations concerning high-frequency litigant status.
Questions Presented
- Whether the parties should be required to report on investigation or remediation of the alleged ADA barriers and their anticipated summary-judgment motions.
- Whether the plaintiff should show cause why the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act and other state-law claims.
- Whether failure to respond adequately could support dismissal of the action without prejudice or dismissal of state-law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (10)
- Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 905 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Am. Cargo Transp., Inc. v. United States, 625 F.3d 1176, 1179 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Hillesheim v. Holiday Stationstores, Inc., 953 F.3d 1059, 1062 (8th Cir. 2020)(followed)
- G. v. Fay Sch., 931 F.3d 1, 11 (1st Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Brooke v. A-Ventures, LLC, 2017 WL 5624941, at *5 (D. Ariz. Nov. 22, 2017)(followed)
- Oliver v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 654 F.3d 903, 911 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Buckhannon Bd. & Care Home, Inc. v. W. Va. Dept. of Health & Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598 (2001)(followed)
- Molski v. Foster Freeze Paso Robles, 267 Fed. Appx. 631, 632 (9th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- City of Chicago v. Int'l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 173 (1997)(followed)
- Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 (1988)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…