Alana Dunn v. IRS, et al.

Case No. 1:25-cv-0963 JLT EPG · United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · September 30, 2025 · No. 1:25-cv-0963 JLT EPG

Summary

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California dismissed Alana Dunn’s action against the IRS and other defendants without prejudice because she failed to pay the filing fee after being ordered to do so. The court applied Ninth Circuit factors governing dismissal as a sanction and directed the Clerk to terminate the pending motion and close the case.

Holdings

  1. Dismissal without prejudice was appropriate because Plaintiff failed to pay the required filing fee by the court-ordered deadline after receiving a warning that nonpayment would result in dismissal.
  2. The Henderson factors weighed in favor of dismissal because the public interest in expeditious resolution, the Court's need to manage its docket, and the risk of prejudice supported dismissal; the prior warning satisfied consideration of less drastic sanctions, and the merits factor did not outweigh the other factors.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee as ordered.
  2. Whether the Ninth Circuit's five factors governing terminating sanctions supported dismissal.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (6)

  • Saddozai v. Davis, 35 F.4th 705, 709 (9th Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 133 n.2 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…