Summary
The court recommends granting Plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a favorable Social Security disability determination on remand. It finds the application timely and the requested $15,401.50 fee reasonable, while directing counsel to refund the $6,579.39 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
Holdings
- The fee application should be deemed timely because the fourteen-day period is subject to equitable tolling and began when counsel received notice of the benefits calculation; counsel filed within fourteen days of receiving that notice.
- The requested $15,401.50 fee should be approved as reasonable because it represented 25% of past-due benefits, complied with the statutory cap, was supported by a valid contingency-fee agreement, and did not result from fraud, overreaching, undue delay, or an unreasonable windfall.
- Counsel should be directed to refund plaintiff any amount received under the EAJA because fees may be awarded under both the EAJA and § 406(b), but the claimant's attorney must refund the smaller fee.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiff's § 406(b) attorney-fee application was timely when filed within fourteen days after counsel received delayed notice of the agency's benefits calculation.
- Whether the requested $15,401.50 contingency fee was reasonable under § 406(b), the fee agreement, and the applicable statutory 25% cap.
- Whether counsel was required to refund to plaintiff the amount previously received under the EAJA.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (11)
- Culbertson v. Berryhill, 586 U.S. 53, 55-56 (2019)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 794, 796 (2002)(followed)
- Sinkler v. Berryhill, 932 F.3d 83, 86-88, 91 (2d Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Wells v. Sullivan, 907 F.2d 367, 371-72 (2d Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Devenish v. Astrue, 85 F. Supp. 3d 634, 636 (E.D.N.Y. 2015)(followed)
- Fields v. Kijakazi, 24 F.4th 845, 849 (2d Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Hanna v. Kijakazi, No. 21-CV-5543 (EK) (SJB), 2024 WL 4252032, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 14, 2024)(followed)
- Shawn H. v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:19-CV-113 (KJD), 2021 WL 4990049, at *2 (D. Vt. Oct. 27, 2021)(followed)
- Farrar v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 22-CV-8844 (JCM), 2025 WL 2855628, at *2-3 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 2025)(followed)
- Lapompe v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, No. 21-CV-4160 (EK) (TAM), 2025 WL 624423, at *2 n.2 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 7, 2025), report and recommendation adopted, 2025 WL 622877 (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 2025)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 11.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…