Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California adopted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation in a habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court overruled the petitioner’s objections, granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss, denied the petition, and directed that the action be dismissed without prejudice.
Holdings
- A district judge must conduct de novo review of the portions of a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation to which a party makes proper, specific written objections; absent a proper objection, challenges to a finding are waived.
- The petitioner's objections did not warrant modification of the magistrate judge's recommendation; the motion to dismiss was granted, the petition was denied, and the action was dismissed without prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court was required to conduct de novo review of the portions of the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation challenged by petitioner's specific objections.
- Whether petitioner's objections warranted rejection or modification of the magistrate judge's recommendation to grant the motion to dismiss and dismiss the § 2241 action without prejudice.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (2)
- United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Chith v. Haynes, 2021 WL 4744596, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2021)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…