Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California reviewed the denial of Michael H.'s application for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits. The court held that the Administrative Law Judge did not provide legally sufficient reasons for discounting the claimant's subjective symptom testimony, particularly by relying primarily on mild objective findings and characterizing treatment as conservative. The court reversed the Commissioner's decision and remanded the matter for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Holdings
- The ALJ improperly discounted Plaintiff's subjective symptom testimony because the ALJ relied on minimal or mild objective findings and characterized treatment as conservative without providing legally sufficient reasons supported by substantial evidence.
- Remand for further administrative proceedings, rather than an immediate award of benefits, was appropriate because outstanding factual issues remained and the record did not clearly require a finding of disability.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ALJ properly evaluated Plaintiff's subjective symptom testimony.
- Whether the ALJ properly evaluated the medical opinion evidence.
- Whether the case should be remanded for further proceedings or for an immediate award of benefits.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (26)
- Carmickle v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 533 F.3d 1155, 1159(followed)
- Brewes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 682 F.3d 1157, 1161(followed)
- Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1154(followed)
- Gutierrez v. Commissioner of Social Security, 740 F.3d 519, 522(followed)
- Burch v. Barnhart, 400 F.3d 676, 681(followed)
- Magallanes v. Bowen, 881 F.2d 747, 750(followed)
- Orn v. Astrue, 495 F.3d 625, 630(followed)
- Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 492(followed)
- Lingenfelter v. Astrue, 504 F.3d 1028, 1035-36(followed)
- Bunnell v. Sullivan, 947 F.2d 341, 344 (en banc)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 26.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.