Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California granted Ameris Bank's motion for default judgment against 2 Sons Trucking LLC and Willie Hall. The court found that the Eitel factors supported default judgment on claims for breach of an equipment financing agreement and guaranty. The court awarded $193,108.95 in compensatory damages, $14,071.40 in prejudgment interest, $7,462.17 in attorney fees, and $655.00 in costs.
Holdings
- Default judgment was appropriate because all Eitel factors favored entry of judgment: plaintiff would otherwise lack a remedy, the claims were adequately pleaded, the amount sought was related to defendants' contractual misconduct, a factual dispute was unlikely, excusable neglect was unlikely after proper service, and defendants' failure to appear made a merits decision impractical.
- Ameris Bank adequately pleaded that 2 Sons breached the equipment financing agreement and that Hall breached the guaranty.
- Ameris Bank was entitled to $193,108.95 in compensatory damages for the remaining monthly payments due under the equipment financing agreement and guaranty.
- Ameris Bank was entitled to prejudgment interest at 10 percent per annum from August 23, 2024, through May 15, 2025, totaling $14,071.40.
- Ameris Bank was entitled to $7,462.17 in attorney fees and $655.00 in costs.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Eitel factors favored entry of default judgment against defendants who were served but failed to appear.
- Whether the complaint adequately pleaded breach-of-contract claims based on the equipment financing agreement and guaranty.
- Whether the plaintiff proved compensatory damages, prejudgment interest, attorney fees, and costs recoverable on default judgment.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (32)
- Landstar Ranger, Inc. v. Parth Enters. Inc., 725 F. Supp. 2d 916, 920 (C.D. Cal. 2010)(followed)
- PepsiCo, Inc. v. Cal. Sec. Cans, 238 F. Supp. 2d 1172, 1175-77 (C.D. Cal. 2002)(followed)
- Seiko Epson Corp. v. Prinko Image Co. (USA), 2018 WL 6264988, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2018)(followed)
- Bd. of Trustees of Sheet Metal Workers v. Moak, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 156381, 2012 WL 5379565, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2012)(followed)
- Cathcart, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19998, 2010 WL 1048829, at *4(followed)
- Cripps v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 980 F.2d 1261, 1267 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Danning v. Lavine, 572 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir. 1978)(followed)
- Oasis W. Realty, LLC v. Goldman, 51 Cal. 4th 811, 821 (2011)(followed)
- CDF Firefighters v. Maldonado, 158 Cal. App. 4th 1226, 1239 (2008)(followed)
- Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc. v. S. W. Solar, Inc., 2022 WL 3574413, at *2 (C.D. Cal. June 7, 2022)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 32.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…