Armen Mardusian v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

Mardusian · United States District Court for the Central District of California · July 21, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-03641 HDV JPRx

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of California denied Armen Mardusian’s motion to remand a Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act action. The court held that complete diversity existed and that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000 based on the vehicle’s purchase price and potential civil penalties.

Holdings

  1. Complete diversity existed because Plaintiff was adequately shown to be a California citizen, while Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, whose sole member was incorporated in Delaware and had its principal place of business in Michigan, was a citizen of Delaware and Michigan rather than California.
  2. The amount in controversy exceeded $75,000 because the $70,080.24 purchase price, together with potential civil penalties of up to twice the actual damages, yielded a potential recovery of $210,240.72.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the parties were completely diverse for purposes of federal diversity jurisdiction.
  2. Whether the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000, including potential civil penalties under the Song-Beverly Act.
  3. Whether the removed action should be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Disposition

remanded

Cases Cited (12)

  • Prize Frize, Inc. v. Matrix, Inc., 167 F.3d 1261, 1265 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100, 108–09 (1941)(followed)
  • Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 68 (1996)(followed)
  • Kanter v. Warner-Lambert Co., 265 F.3d 853, 857 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Columbia Props. Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 U.S. 77, 92–93 (2010)(followed)
  • Fritsch v. Swift Transp. Co. of Arizona, LLC, 899 F.3d 785, 793 (9th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Lewis v. Verizon Commc’ns. Inc., 627 F.3d 395, 400 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Campbell v. Vitran Express, Inc., 471 F. App’x 646, 648 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…