Christian Daniel Rilloraza v. 7-Eleven, Inc. and 7-Eleven Store No. 29694

Rilloraza · United States District Court for the Central District of California · November 4, 2025 · No. EDCV 25-01362-KK-SPx

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed Christian Daniel Rilloraza’s Americans with Disabilities Act action against 7-Eleven, Inc. and 7-Eleven Store No. 29694 without prejudice. The court dismissed the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because the plaintiff failed to submit required USM-285 forms and file a notice of submission after being warned that noncompliance could result in dismissal.

Holdings

  1. A district court may sua sponte dismiss an action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) when a plaintiff fails to prosecute the action or comply with a court order.
  2. Dismissal without prejudice was warranted because the public interest in expeditious resolution, the Court's need to manage its docket, the presumption of prejudice to Defendants, and the availability of less drastic sanctions favored dismissal, and those considerations outweighed the policy favoring disposition on the merits.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the district court could sua sponte dismiss the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and comply with the Court's service-related order.
  2. Whether the five dismissal factors favored dismissal without prejudice under the circumstances.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (8)

  • Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Omstead v. Dell, Inc., 594 F.3d 1081, 1084 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
  • Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Langere v. Verizon Wireless Servs., LLC, 983 F.3d 1115, 1117 (9th Cir. 2020)(overruled_on_other_grounds)
  • In re Eisen, 31 F.3d 1447, 1452-53 (9th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Morris v. Morgan Stanley & Co., 942 F.2d 648, 652 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • W. Coast Theater Corp. v. City of Portland, 897 F.2d 1519, 1523 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…