Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California ordered the plaintiff to show cause why the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims under California's Unruh Civil Rights Act. The court also required disclosures concerning the specific statutory damages sought and whether the plaintiff and counsel meet California's definition of high-frequency litigant, warning that noncompliance could result in dismissal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's Unruh Civil Rights Act claims.
- Whether plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel must provide information sufficient for the court to determine whether plaintiff satisfies California's definition of a high-frequency litigant.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 173 (1997)(followed)
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 (1988)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…