Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed Dmytro Ivanov’s mandamus action concerning an immigration application. The court dismissed the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because the plaintiff failed to prosecute the case and comply with court orders.
Holdings
- Dismissal was warranted because plaintiff failed to prosecute the action and failed to comply with the court's order requiring a proof of service and substitution-of-counsel form.
Questions Presented
- Whether dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) was warranted because plaintiff failed to prosecute the action.
- Whether dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) was warranted because plaintiff failed to comply with the court's order requiring a proof of service and substitution-of-counsel form.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (7)
- Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962)(followed)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640, 642 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- In re Eisen, 31 F.3d 1447, 1452-53 (9th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Anderson v. Air West, Inc., 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976)(followed)
- Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Morris v. Morgan Stanley Co., 942 F.2d 648, 652 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…