Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California grants Plaintiff Ethelbert Clay Sr.’s motion to remand his Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and related claims against General Motors LLC. The court concludes that Defendant established estimated actual damages and civil penalties totaling $62,204.64 but did not sufficiently establish attorney’s fees, leaving the amount in controversy below the $75,000 diversity-jurisdiction threshold. The case is remanded to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, and the federal case is closed.
Holdings
- The Court may account for Song-Beverly Act use offsets and other statutory offsets when estimating the amount in controversy. Defendant established estimated actual damages of $20,734.88.
- Defendant established that $41,469.76 in Song-Beverly civil penalties was in controversy because Plaintiff expressly sought a penalty of two times actual damages and the record showed multiple repair presentations.
- Defendant failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that Plaintiff's attorney's fees would exceed the amount needed to satisfy the jurisdictional threshold.
- Defendant did not establish that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000; therefore, the Court lacked a sufficient basis to retain diversity jurisdiction and granted the motion to remand.
Questions Presented
- Whether Defendant established by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000 for diversity jurisdiction.
- Whether the estimated restitution damages, civil penalties, and attorney's fees could be included in calculating the amount in controversy.
- Whether the case should be remanded because the jurisdictional amount was not established.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (13)
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994)(followed)
- Fritsch v. Swift Transp. Co. of Ariz., LLC, 899 F.3d 785, 793, 795 (9th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Moore-Thomas v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., 553 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Covarrubias v. Ford Motor Co., 2025 WL 907544, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2025)(followed)
- Schneider v. Ford Motor Co., 756 F. App'x 699, 701 n.3 (9th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Godoy v. Jaguar Land Rover N. Am., LLC, 2024 WL 4682310, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 5, 2024)(followed)
- Mitchell v. Blue Bird Body Co., 80 Cal. App. 4th 32, 38 (2000)(followed)
- Savall v. FCA US LLC, 2021 WL 1661051, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2021)(acknowledged)
- Castillo v. FCA USA, LLC, 2019 WL 6607006, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2019)(followed)
- Lopez v. Kia Am., Inc., 693 F. Supp. 3d 1063, 1068 (C.D. Cal. 2023)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.