Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California denied Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for a preliminary injunction in a copyright and trademark infringement action for lack of personal jurisdiction over Defendant. The Court found that Plaintiffs had not shown Defendant purposefully directed its activities toward California under the Calder effects test. The Court nevertheless granted limited expedited discovery concerning personal jurisdiction and damages, to be completed by August 1, 2025.
Holdings
- Plaintiffs failed to establish that defendant purposefully directed its activities toward California under the Calder effects test, and therefore failed to establish specific personal jurisdiction.
- The Court denied the preliminary-injunction motion because plaintiffs had not established personal jurisdiction over defendant.
- Plaintiffs demonstrated good cause for expedited discovery concerning personal jurisdiction and damages, so the Court granted the request.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiffs established specific personal jurisdiction over the nonresident defendant based on online sales and alleged infringement directed toward California.
- Whether plaintiffs were entitled to a preliminary injunction.
- Whether plaintiffs demonstrated good cause for expedited discovery concerning personal jurisdiction and damages.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (25)
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008)(followed)
- Flathead-Lolo-Bitterroot Citizen Task Force v. Montana, 98 F.4th 1180, 1190 (9th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- All. for the Wild Rockies v. Pena, 865 F.3d 1211, 1217 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- All. for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, 1133 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Pebble Beach Co. v. Caddy, 453 F.3d 1151, 1154-55 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Licea v. Caraway Home Inc., 655 F. Supp. 3d 954, 961 (C.D. Cal. 2023)(followed)
- Ayla, LLC v. Alya Skin Pty. Ltd., 11 F.4th 972, 979-80 (9th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 139 (2014)(followed)
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- AMA Multimedia, LLC v. Wanat, 970 F.3d 1201, 1208-09 (9th Cir. 2020)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 25.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…