Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California remanded the action to Los Angeles County Superior Court after the United States, the basis for federal removal jurisdiction, was dismissed. The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims against the other defendants under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).
Holdings
- The court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state-law claims because all claims over which the court had original jurisdiction had been dismissed and the relevant considerations of judicial economy, convenience, fairness, and comity favored declining jurisdiction.
- The action was remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should decline supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims after the claims against the United States, which supplied the basis for federal jurisdiction, were dismissed.
- Whether the action should be remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (2)
- Satey v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., 521 F.3d 1087, 1091 (9th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 351 (1988)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…