Keya Morgan v. County of Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office

Morgan · United States District Court for the Central District of California · April 18, 2025 · No. 2:23-cv-10474-MRA-MAR

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of California entered judgment in favor of the County of Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, Jackie Lacey, and Jeffrey C. Stodel, Jr. after granting their motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The judgment dismissed Keya Morgan’s claims against those defendants with prejudice pursuant to Rules 54(b) and 58(a), while claims against Joan Celia Lee and Kirk Schenk remained pending.

Holdings

  1. A district court may direct entry of a final judgment as to fewer than all claims or parties when the judgment is final and there is no just reason for delay under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).
  2. The judgment dismissing the claims against the County Defendants with prejudice was a final judgment for purposes of Rule 54(b).
  3. There was no just reason to delay entry of judgment because the claims resolved against the County Defendants had minimal interrelationship with the remaining claims and separate judgment would not create improper piecemeal appeals.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court could direct entry of a final judgment in favor of fewer than all parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) while claims against other defendants remained pending.
  2. Whether there was no just reason for delay in entering judgment for the County Defendants.
  3. Whether the judgment was final and sufficiently separate from the remaining claims to avoid improper piecemeal appeals.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Noel v. Hall, 568 F.3d 743, 747 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Elec. Co., 446 U.S. 1, 7-8 (1980)(followed)
  • AmerisourceBergen Corp. v. Dialysist W., Inc., 465 F.3d 946, 954 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • S.E.C. v. Platforms Wireless Int’l Corp., 617 F.3d 1072, 1084 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…