Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California ordered the parties to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with a prior order requiring a settlement conference and a related settlement filing. The court warned that failure to respond by August 29, 2025, could result in sanctions or dismissal for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Questions Presented
- Whether the parties should be required to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the court's settlement-conference and reporting order.
- Whether failure to respond to the order to show cause could warrant sanctions or dismissal for lack of prosecution.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S. Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962)(followed)
- Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 909 (2003)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…