Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed the action as moot without prejudice. The court discharged the order to show cause and vacated the scheduled May 30, 2025 hearing because the plaintiff's asylum interview had been scheduled and the plaintiff had not responded to defense counsel's contact attempts or the order to show cause.
Holdings
- Because the plaintiff's requested asylum interview had been scheduled and the plaintiff did not respond to the notice of mootness or the order to show cause, the action was moot and was dismissed without prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed as moot after the asylum interview requested by the plaintiff was scheduled.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (1)
- Tan v. Radel, No. CV 24-2209, 2024 WL 3091962, at *1 (C.D. Cal. June 20, 2024)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…