Luz Zendejas v. Ara Tahmasian-Zarneh

United States District Court for the Central District of California · August 20, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-06039-DSF-SK

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of California ordered the plaintiff to show cause why the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over claims under California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act and any other state-law claims. The court required information concerning the statutory damages sought and declarations addressing whether the plaintiff and counsel qualify as high-frequency litigants under California law, warning that failure to respond could result in dismissal of the state-law claims or the entire action without prejudice.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Civil Rights Act claim and any other state-law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).
  2. Whether plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel satisfy the statutory definition of high-frequency litigants under California Code of Civil Procedure section 425.55(b)(1) and (2).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • City of Chicago v. International College of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 173 (1997)(followed)
  • Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 (1988)(followed)
  • Vo v. Choi, 49 F.4th 1167 (9th Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • Arroyo v. Rosas, 19 F.4th 1202 (9th Cir. 2021)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…