Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California issued an order to show cause regarding consolidation of multiple related Whaleco malware litigation cases. The court proposed consolidating the cases for all purposes under a master docket, designating operative pleadings, and establishing procedures for future filings and case management.
Holdings
- The court determined that common questions of law and fact predominated because the complaints were identical and the actions had been designated as related, and it proposed consolidating the actions for all purposes under Rule 42(a), subject to any timely objections.
Questions Presented
- Whether the related actions involved common questions of law or fact warranting consolidation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a).
- Whether the interests of judicial convenience outweighed the potential for delay, confusion, or prejudice from consolidating the actions.
- Whether the court should adopt the proposed master-docket and case-management procedures for the consolidated action.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Hall v. Hall, 584 U.S. 59, 77 (2018)(followed)
- Knox v. Yingli Green Energy Holding Co., 136 F. Supp. 3d 1159, 1162 (C.D. Cal. 2015)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…