Mario Mendoza v. Ann Miller, et al.

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of California orders the plaintiff to show cause why the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over claims under California's Unruh Civil Rights Act and any other state-law claims. The order requires the plaintiff and counsel to submit declarations addressing whether they qualify as high-frequency litigants and to identify the statutory damages sought, with a response due December 30, 2025.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and any other state-law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).
2. Whether plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel qualify as high-frequency litigants under California Civil Procedure Code § 425.55(b)(1) and (2).

Disposition

other