Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California orders the plaintiff to show cause why the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over claims under California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act and any other state-law claims. The order requires the plaintiff to identify the statutory damages sought and provide declarations addressing whether the plaintiff and counsel qualify as high-frequency litigants under California law.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's Unruh Civil Rights Act claim and any other state-law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c).
- Whether the plaintiff and counsel must provide information and declarations addressing whether they qualify as high-frequency litigants under California law.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- City of Chicago v. Int’l Coll. of Surgeons, 522 U.S. 156, 173 (1997)(followed)
- Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 (1988)(followed)
- Vo v. Choi, 49 F.4th 1167 (9th Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Arroyo v. Rosas, 19 F.4th 1202 (9th Cir. 2021)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…