Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California granted Plaintiff Teshaun Deberry’s motion to remand a vehicle warranty action to the Superior Court of California, County of Riverside. The court held that Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC’s removal based on the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act claim was untimely because the thirty-day removal period began when Defendant received the First Amended Complaint on February 4, 2025. The court concluded that the Magnuson-Moss Act’s $50,000 amount-in-controversy requirement was satisfied, but remanded the case based on the procedural defect.
Holdings
- When a defendant has been served with the initial summons and subsequently receives an amended complaint that first establishes removability, the thirty-day removal period under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(3) begins upon receipt of the amended complaint. Defendant's removal on March 26, 2025, more than thirty days after receipt of the February 4, 2025 first amended complaint, was untimely.
- The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act's minimum amount-in-controversy requirement was satisfied because the vehicle's total contract price was $65,733.52, exceeding the statutory minimum of $50,000.
Questions Presented
- Whether Defendant's March 26, 2025 notice of removal was timely when Plaintiff's first amended complaint adding a federal Magnuson-Moss claim was filed and received on February 4, 2025, after Defendant had already been served with the initial summons.
- Whether the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act's minimum amount-in-controversy requirement of $50,000 was satisfied.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (28)
- Harris v. Bankers Life & Cas. Co., 425 F.3d 689 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Mayes v. Am. Hallmark Ins. Co. of Tex., 114 F.4th 1077 (9th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- Lovern v. General Motors Corp., 121 F.3d 160 (4th Cir. 1997)(followed)
- Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344 (1999)(followed)
- Lee v. City of Beaumont, 12 F.3d 933 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co., 846 F.2d 1190 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Lewis v. City of Fresno, 627 F. Supp. 2d 1179 (E.D. Cal. 2008)(followed)
- United States ex rel. Walker v. Gunn, 511 F.2d 1024 (9th Cir. 1975)(followed)
- Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Boggs v. Lewis, 863 F.2d 662 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 28.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.