Summary
The United States District Court for the Central District of California held Martha A. Velarde in civil contempt for violating a limited injunction governing federal tax-return preparation. The court found by clear and convincing evidence that Velarde knowingly used incorrect social security numbers for qualifying persons without making the required due-diligence inquiries, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 6695 and applicable Treasury regulations. The court imposed a $20,000 coercive sanction, payable within 60 days, while declining to award the Government's requested $228,575 disgorgement.
Holdings
- The Government proved by clear and convincing evidence that Velarde violated the Limited Injunction by knowingly providing incorrect social-security numbers for qualifying persons without making the reasonable inquiries required by the applicable due-diligence regulation.
- The Government did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that Velarde improperly claimed head-of-household status on all of the challenged returns.
- A $20,000 sanction was appropriate to compel Velarde's compliance with the Limited Injunction.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Government proved by clear and convincing evidence that Velarde violated the specific and definite terms of the Limited Injunction.
- Whether Velarde demonstrated that she was unable to comply with the injunction's tax-return-preparer due-diligence requirements.
- Whether a $20,000 civil-contempt sanction was appropriate to coerce compliance with the injunction.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Spallone v. United States, 493 U.S. 265, 276 (1990)(followed)
- In re Dual-Deck Video Cassette Recorder Antitrust Litig., 10 F.3d 693, 695 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Shuffler v. Heritage Bank, 720 F.2d 1141, 1147 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- FTC v. Affordable Media, LLC, 179 F.3d 1228, 1239 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Stone v. City & County of San Francisco, 968 F.2d 850, 856 n.9 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- FTC v. Productive Mktg., Inc., 136 F. Supp. 2d 1096, 1112 (C.D. Cal. 2001)(followed)
- United States v. Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258, 304 (1947)(followed)
- Int'l Union, United Mine Workers of Am. v. Bagwell, 512 U.S. 821, 827 (1994)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.