Yeong Lee v. Young Wan Choi

No. 8:25-cv-00876-JAK (KESx) · United States District Court for the Central District of California · May 12, 2025 · No. No. 8:25-cv-00876-JAK (KESx)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of California ordered the plaintiff to show cause why the court should not decline supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims asserted alongside claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The order discusses California’s heightened pleading requirements and high-frequency litigant provisions for construction-related accessibility claims. Plaintiff was directed to identify the statutory damages sought and submit a declaration addressing whether she qualifies as a high-frequency litigant.

Holdings

  1. The court did not decide whether to retain supplemental jurisdiction; instead, it ordered plaintiff to show cause why the court should not decline supplemental jurisdiction over the state-law claims.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's California state-law claims.
  2. Whether the plaintiff should be required to demonstrate whether she qualifies as a high-frequency litigant under California law before the court determines whether to retain the state-law claims.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 (1966)(followed)
  • Nishimoto v. Federman-Bachrach & Assocs., 903 F.2d 709, 715 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Whitaker v. RCP Belmont Shore LLC, No. LA CV19-09561 JAK (JEMx), 2020 WL 3800449, at *6-8 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2020)(followed)
  • Garibay v. Rodriguez, No. 2:18-cv-09187-PA (AFMx), 2019 WL 5204294, at *1-6 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 27, 2019)(followed)
  • Perri v. Thrifty Payless, No. 2:19-CV-07829-CJC (SKx), 2019 WL 7882068, at *2 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2019)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…