Henrikh Vardanyan v. Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center, et al.

Vardanyan · United States District Court for the Central District of California · January 14, 2026 · No. 5:25-cv-03272-SVW (SK)

Summary

The United States District Court orders petitioner Henrikh Vardanyan to show cause why his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition should not be dismissed as moot. Respondents reported that Vardanyan received an individualized Rodriguez bond hearing after filing the petition, but the Immigration Judge denied bond. The court directs petitioner to respond within 14 days and warns that failure to respond may result in dismissal for mootness, lack of prosecution, or noncompliance with court orders.

Holdings

  1. Because petitioner received an individualized bond hearing after filing the petition, the court ordered petitioner to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed as moot.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether petitioner's receipt of an individualized bond hearing potentially deprived the court of the ability to grant effective relief, rendering the habeas petition moot.
  2. Whether petitioner should be required to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed as moot.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Rodriguez v. Robbins, 804 F.3d 1060, 1087 (9th Cir. 2015)(described)
  • Jennings v. Rodriguez, 538 U.S. 281 (2018)(not analyzed)
  • Nw. Env't Def. Ctr. v. Gordon, 849 F.2d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • United States v. Alder Creek Water Co., 823 F.2d 343, 345 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • In re Burrell, 415 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…