Ricardo Estrada Castillo v. Varinder Singh, et al.

Castillo v. Singh · United States District Court for the Central District of California · January 22, 2026 · No. CV 25-1511 FMO (AJRx)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Central District of California remanded the action to the Los Angeles County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court held that the removing defendant failed to establish complete diversity because it did not identify the members of Horizon Royal Carrier Transport, LLC or their citizenships, and denied pending motions as moot.

Holdings

  1. The removing defendants failed to establish complete diversity because Horizon Royal Carrier Transport, LLC did not identify its members or the citizenship of each member.
  2. For diversity-jurisdiction purposes, an LLC's state of organization and principal place of business are irrelevant; the LLC has the citizenship of each of its members.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the removing defendants established federal diversity subject matter jurisdiction.
  2. Whether an LLC's state of organization and principal place of business establish its citizenship for diversity purposes.
  3. Whether the action had to be remanded when the LLC failed to identify its members and their citizenship.

Disposition

remanded

Cases Cited (12)

  • Gaus v. Miles, Inc., 980 F.2d 564, 566 (9th Cir. 1992) (per curiam)(followed)
  • Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chem. Co., 443 F.3d 676, 684 (9th Cir. 2006) (per curiam)(followed)
  • Kelton Arms Condo. Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. Homestead Ins. Co., 346 F.3d 1190, 1192 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Washington v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 2009 WL 1519894, at *1 (C.D. Cal. 2009)(followed)
  • Caterpillar Inc. v. Lewis, 519 U.S. 61, 68, 117 S. Ct. 467, 472 (1996)(followed)
  • Buschman v. Anesthesia Bus. Consultants LLC, 42 F. Supp. 3d 1244, 1248 (N.D. Cal. 2014)(followed)
  • Tele Munchen Fernseh GMBH & Co Produktionsgesellschaft v. Alliance Atlantis Int'l Distrib., LLC, 2013 WL 6055328, at *4 (C.D. Cal. 2013)(followed)
  • Johnson v. Columbia Props. Anchorage, LP, 437 F.3d 894, 899 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Grp., L.P., 541 U.S. 567, 569, 124 S. Ct. 1920, 1923 (2004)(followed)
  • Hart v. Terminex Int'l, 336 F.3d 541, 544 (7th Cir. 2003)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…