Angel Garcia v. Greg's Auto Body, Inc.

United States District Court for the Central District of California · August 1, 2025 · No. 2:25-cv-02872-MAR

Summary

This document is an order to show cause addressing Plaintiff Angel Garcia’s failure to prosecute after Defendants failed to timely answer, had default entered, and later filed an answer without first moving to set aside the default. The Court states that Defendants’ answer must be stricken and orders Plaintiff to request entry of default or explain the delay by August 22, 2025, warning that failure to respond may result in dismissal without prejudice.

Holdings

  1. After default is entered, a defendant may not appear by filing an answer without first moving to set aside the default; Defendants' answer was therefore stricken.
  2. A plaintiff must prosecute the action with reasonable diligence, and the Court may sua sponte require an explanation and warn of dismissal when the plaintiff fails to pursue default judgment after entry of default.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Defendants' answer filed after entry of default, without a prior motion to set aside the default, should be stricken.
  2. Whether Plaintiff's failure to seek default judgment warranted an order to show cause and possible dismissal for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • iBASEt v. Exacore, LLC, No. SACV 13-01781-CJCD-FMX, 2014 WL 12576816, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2014)(followed)
  • Wolff v. California, 318 F.R.D. 627, 630 (C.D. Cal. 2016)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Air W., Inc., 542 F.2d 522, 524 (9th Cir. 1976)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…