Summary
This document is a stipulated protective order entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Wryn v. Oliphant Financial, LLC, Case No. 2:24-cv-10211-JWH-E. It governs the designation, handling, disclosure, challenge, filing under seal, and ultimate return or destruction of confidential discovery materials, and was stipulated and ordered on August 12, 2025.
Holdings
- For good cause shown, the court entered the parties' stipulated protective order governing confidential discovery material and limiting its use to prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle the action.
- The protective order does not itself authorize filing confidential material under seal; a party must comply with Local Rule 79-5 and obtain a court order authorizing sealing of the specific material.
- A designating party must limit confidentiality designations to specific material that qualifies for protection; mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited and unjustified designations may result in sanctions.
Questions Presented
- Whether good cause supported entry of a stipulated protective order governing confidential discovery material.
- What restrictions and procedures should govern designation, disclosure, use, challenge, sealing, and final disposition of protected material in the action.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. General Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Makar-Welbon v. Sony Electronics, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999)(followed)
- Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Association, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…