Summary
This document is a stipulated protective order entered in United Auto Credit Corporation v. Jessica Stewart et al., a federal civil action in the Central District of California. It governs the designation, disclosure, use, challenge, filing, and disposition of confidential and highly confidential discovery materials.
Holdings
- Good cause supported entry of the parties' stipulated protective order to protect qualifying confidential and proprietary discovery material.
- Material designated under the order may be used only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle the action and may be disclosed only to authorized recipients under the specified conditions.
- The protective order does not itself authorize filing protected material under seal; a party seeking sealing must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5 and obtain a court order authorizing sealing of the specific material.
- A party or nonparty may challenge a confidentiality designation, but the designating party bears the burden of persuasion and the material remains protected under the designation until the court rules on the challenge.
- Inadvertent production of privileged or work-product-protected material does not waive the privilege or protection in this action or any other federal or state proceeding, subject to the procedures governing asserted privilege.
Questions Presented
- Whether good cause supported entry of a stipulated protective order governing confidential and highly confidential discovery material.
- What restrictions and procedures should govern designation, disclosure, use, challenge, inadvertent production, sealing, and disposition of protected material.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…